Negative Reputation

[omgDAN!]

Who thinks negative reputation should be removed?

I think it should because:
It just causes arguments
It wastes time removing all the pointless ones
People moan when they get -rep
It isn't used properly most of the time

Also grey reps are pretty annoying too :rolleyes:

Thread closed by Garion (Forum Super Moderator): as it has been bumped.

[Caution]

I agree that grey rep should be removed.
Red as well maybe..

[The-Great-Dude]

If negative was removed, positive would have to be too.

[Nixt]

I don't think it should be. Edit - saw your post below.

[omgDAN!]

If negative was removed, positive would have to be too.

That makes no sense. There is an option in vBulletin to turn off / on negative rep for usergroups.

[The-Great-Dude]

Yes but if negative was removed, then it'd just be mucked up. If someone posted something good, they'd be good repped. And then they could just post some complete rubbish, and wouldn't have to worry because they couldn't get minus repped.

[omgDAN!]

Yes, but when that happens people just put "n00b" or "loser" or stuff like that in the negative reps, and then they get removed. Plus a moderator has the job of giving the poster an infraction if the thread is not good.

[Plank]

i wouldnt mind if they were removed.

[TotalShambles]

If negative rep was removed the whole rep idea would have to be scrapped, defo keep negative rep.

[Mentor]

Meh, im for keeping it as it is "/ Personly i drc for the most part, its pointless.