Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 90
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    7,327
    Tokens
    1,276
    Habbo
    ---MAD---

    Latest Awards:

    Default Animal Testing - Let it carry on? [Closes 06/03/07]

    Do you think animal testing should carry on? It is a major factor it a lot of experiments that lead to big successes that help humans in lots of areas in science.

    What do you think?
    ---MAD---

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    7,455
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    It may help humans but IMO its wrong & cruel to test products on living creatures of this world.
    Next match: Ipswich (H) Sunday 4th November, 12.45pm.
    3535
    ta very much; esurient
    myspace

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Sunderland
    Posts
    806
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    I think it is wrong for testing things like hairsprays/cosmetic stuff etc.

    HOWEVER... I think it is perfectly acceptable to test regarding cures to diseases such as cancer and also to use animals to grow human body parts such as ears etc.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Bradford
    Posts
    2,667
    Tokens
    99

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich.Boy View Post
    I think it is wrong for testing things like hairsprays/cosmetic stuff etc.

    HOWEVER... I think it is perfectly acceptable to test regarding cures to diseases such as cancer and also to use animals to grow human body parts such as ears etc.

    i agree with that,

    in my opinion, it is unacceptable to test cosmetics on animals, as its not them that will be using the final product - its us!

    human testing should be used for cosmetics testing, afterall, animals do not show the same allergic reactions to humans, so a product that had no effect on animals could well end up with humans having an allergic reaction to it.

    as for animal testing in medical science, to some extent this is reasonably safe, because the animals being tested on can be genetically modified to give them maybe human genes, meaning that the results of animal and human testing ought to be similar, as long as theres no lasting harm done to the animals during the tests, then i do not have a problem with testing new drugs/medicines on animals
    Rep Points: 1065
    Last Good Rep From: Cyndia
    Last Bad Rep From: someone too cowardly to leave their name



    The People I Trust:
    Royal, Cwmbran, base, :Jakey, Destiny, Laurae90, Evolution, Mik, deagle

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    7,455
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lysosome View Post
    as long as theres no lasting harm done to the animals during the tests, then i do not have a problem with testing new drugs/medicines on animals
    Yes but alot of the time there is harm done to them which i find wrong.
    Next match: Ipswich (H) Sunday 4th November, 12.45pm.
    3535
    ta very much; esurient
    myspace

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,780
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think its bad, but is better than using humans, adding to that they should test it on peadophiles n stuff (sp).


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,183
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    the poeple who like animal testing i think should get tested on themeselves and see how they like it

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Portsmouth, UK
    Posts
    3,361
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    for drugs, it should
    for cosmetics. no.

    Also

    DJ they do it on animals that have been bred inside these labs so they can be used on them. Ar you volunteering to get drugged?

    Remember what happened to those men a few months ago?

    they almost DIED. You nub.
    MFC Results
    Home Vs Blackburn: 1-2 (Downing)
    Away Vs Wigan: 0-1
    Away Vs Fulham: 2-1 (Mido and Cattermole)
    Home Vs Newcastle: 2-2 (Mido and Arca)

    Next match
    Home vs Northampton

    Her face just makes my day

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    434
    Tokens
    0

    Default

    How is it right, animals are being killed for you make- up, there is areas like shoe box sized, min food and water, should be doing exercises, the argument of, the medicines thing, n oway, if we cared that much we wouldnt abuse them, people dont care so no one gives a dam, the majority of you say they dissage but I bet they dont actually LOOK at what there buying to see if it non animal tested, well I do, and also, if you CARE about animals so much, Im sure your a vegy? If yes then thats ok, but if not, your just a hippocrit, as they die in the same way.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    176
    Tokens
    0

    Default hmm

    i think its totally ok. if we did not carry out tests on animals we would have not discovered how to cure illnesses. As for make up i think thats on 2. its only an animal get over it. think how many youve eaten away in the past.

Page 1 of 9 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •