Naming Scammers

[Kieeran]

I didn't know where to put this because i wanted other people to be able to post.

But don't you think we should be able to name scammers i mean if we don't there just going to scam more people?

I know you could just name scammers to spite thembut if you have picture proof or vid proof then surely it should be acceptable? i have alot of infractions from naming scammers from ding trades in the runescape section. I know it's our fault for trading but at least after we've made our mistake of being scammed at least warn others?

Post your opinions etc.
MODs please read as well.

[Youheard]

In my opinion naming scammers will only cause more and more arguements. Also pictures (especially Runescape pictures) are very easily edited. If you aren't prepared to be scammed then you shouldn't undertake in trust trades.

[Kieeran]

Well editng thems pretty pathetic. But i can see where your coming from.

[Scott™]

I think its stupid tbh, Because say i could go on rs bit then scam 5m scam another 5m scam 2m scam another 500k or something.. No one would be able to say i scam so i could keep scamming getting millions :S, Obviously i dont scam as its lame but its stupid that you cant say the scammers.

[asher_]

barmi, definitely

[-Dispute]

I know what you mean, but I dissagree.

[Kieeran]

Well thats yo7ur opinion. im not going to disagree. just expressing my opinion

[:Jamie]

Disagree along with the load of other threads ive disgareed with thats been posted here, maybe use the search feature and you answer your own question that way.

[brandon]

You can actually name a scammer, indirectly. If you say so and so scams in a thread, your post will be edited with, please do not accuse members of scamming, this means that people that read your post know you've accused them of scamming, which is ok if you don't mind an infraction omg i'm so clever.

[Axel]

There's a good arguement for and against naming scammers, so might as well just leave it as it is.