K, well I refuse to see how this is fair. For non vip's, the signature height still remains as 150px. Yet if you're a vip, you are granted 300px. Also, there was no point in introducing the "new feature" that came with the new ranking system, as there has been no change whatsoever when it comes to the height of signatures until you reach platinum rank, pointless.
Why should people who use the forum bother paying atleast £1.50, just to get double the height in signature? It's unfair, seeing as a 300 height signature is an eye-sore, and unnecessary. There should be a fixed height on both parties, non-vip & vip members or atleast raise non-vip's height to 215px, the members of VIP still get 85 more px to spare. Besides, the 300px system is abused by numerous people making plain signatures, with "700px width, 300px height" blatently on the basis to annoy people.
Back to one of my other points, why should people have to pay money to get a minute leverage in something that you can get for free on numerous other forums? It's hardly an advantage, and if you consider it to be logical than you have serious problems. Non-VIP members shouldn't have to post atleast 4000 posts, just to get the extra space - non-vip's should have a reasonable space to put their work in, seeing as alot of the non-vip's are far more capable of producing work worth looking at. Some people could produce better things (non-vip's) with a canvas of 700x215, and it's hardly asking much - when VIP's are allowed a canvas of such a bigger size.
It's unreasonable for those who take their time to post, rather than purchasing a minute feature which seems to be apart of the "vip package". I think you should sort it out, as it's clearly unfair.





Reply With Quote







.


