Who is stronger....

[Ashley]

Mages or Rangers.

[PaulMacC]

Someone define ranger?

[Vibes]

Bow+arrows = ranger

[Jahova]

Range is for single target.
Mage is for multi target.
Kthnxbye.

- Tom

[Burns]

Range owns mage

[:Delirium]

cb triangle shows that range empowers mage, also, range can hits 60s, mage max of 30.

[Ashley]

cb triangle shows that range empowers mage, also, range can hits 60s, mage max of 30.

But if mages manage to successfully bind a ranger then it's gonna be over quite quickly.
Especially if it was an Ancient.

[:Delirium]

doesnt matter if they can bind? rangers can still farcast.

[Neil]

Range owns mage

cb triangle shows that range empowers mage, also, range can hits 60s, mage max of 30.

Most of that's down the range armour having a greater defence bonus against magic than chain/plate armour.
It depends who you're against, the warriors can easily take rangers and mages, but mages are better off because they can hit against a warrior harder than a ranger can, but they're both pretty low on melee defence, a ranger has a hard time against warriors because the range defence on a warrior is higher than range defence of robes
It depends on what you're going fight against, I think it's best to be range/mage because then you can take on alot of different styles

[:Delirium]

basically to sum up what neil said, range pwns mage.