Army of Two

[pacific]

I just got off Online and it's amazing. You co op with someone and the other team has a double team. So 4 people in total, you do objectives together for cash and stuff but you have to beat the other team to it. AND ontop of that there is computers wondering around shooting you and the other team to make it even more challenging and stuff.

You need this game if you don't have it

It's better then GRAW x10 and the controls are easy

[Crazy Bartender]

I'm back on this account now :rolleyes: /uncautioned

Anyway, it's well good!

[Alan_Carr]

Hmm, still not convinced whether to splash out £40 or w.e for a game which has various reviews.
I'm happy with COD4, and i'd rather play a demo, so i can actually understand it before i purchase it.

[Azul]

What are you on about? This game is nothing like GRAW so why compare it?

[mangle]

Its alright , i'd like a different cover system. You really miss bullet penitration aswell! Apart from that its pretty sick , takes a while to get used to but its still pretty good.

Only complaint is its sometimes a little robotic shall we say.

[Wootzeh]

2v2 doesnt float my boat

[mangle]

Well i reckon its the best mode for army of two. Its a two man game and can you imagine 8 man online. It'd be two v two v two v two which would SUCK imo.

[Crazy Bartender]

What are you on about? This game is nothing like GRAW so why compare it?

The controls are similar, and the way that you don't use "first person view" similars it to GRAW

[Azul]

Er, nope, still nothing like GRAW. It's not in first peson because it isn't an FPS.
So basically every game that is played in third person should be compared to GRAW?

[Jord]

Er, nope, still nothing like GRAW. It's not in first peson because it isn't an FPS.
So basically every game that is played in third person should be compared to GRAW?

He said it owns it by x10 so hes not saying there the same hes saying It OWNS IT