Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 29
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,101
    Tokens
    981

    Latest Awards:

    Default Briton Jailed - Hacked Top Secret Military Computers.

    Source from BBC News.
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7532713.stm
    A Briton accused of hacking into top secret military computers has lost a Law Lords appeal against being extradited to stand trial in the US.
    Glasgow-born Gary McKinnon could face life in jail if convicted of accessing 97 US military and Nasa computers.
    He has admitted breaking into the computers from his London home but said he was seeking information on UFOs.
    The 42-year-old's lawyers said they would apply to the European Court of Human Rights to prevent his removal.



    Mr McKinnon first lost his case at the High Court in 2006 before taking it to the highest court in the UK, the House of Lords.
    He was arrested in 2002 but never charged in the UK.
    The US government claims he committed a malicious crime - the biggest military computer hack ever.
    The authorities have warned that without his co-operation and a guilty plea the case could be treated as terrorism and he could face a long jail sentence.
    A statement by solicitors for McKinnon, who was not at the Lords to hear the judgement, said: "Gary McKinnon is neither a terrorist nor a terrorist sympathiser.
    "His case could have been properly dealt with by our own prosecuting authorities. We believe that the British government declined to prosecute him to enable the US government to make an example of him.
    "American officials involved in this case have stated that they want to see him 'fry'.
    "The consequences he faces if extradited are both disproportionate and intolerable."
    'Computer nerd'
    Their client is accused of hacking into the computers with the intention of intimidating the US government.
    It alleges that between February 2001 and March 2002, he hacked into dozens of US Army, Navy, Air Force, and Department of Defense computers, as well as 16 Nasa computers.
    .
    American officials involved in this case have stated that they want to see him 'fry'


    Gary McKinnon's lawyers

    Prosecutors say he altered and deleted files at a naval air station not long after the 11 September attacks in 2001, rendering critical systems inoperable.
    Mr McKinnon, who is unemployed, has admitted that he accessed computers in the US without authority.
    But he has said he is merely a computer nerd, whose motives were harmless and innocent. He denies any attempts at sabotage.
    He said he wanted to find evidence of UFOs he thought was being held by the US authorities, and to expose what he believed was a cover-up.
    Repatriated
    The Law Lords were told by Mr McKinnon's lawyers that extraditing him would be an abuse of proceedings.


    Gary McKinnon talks to Huw Edwards on BBC News in July 2006

    US authorities had threatened him with a long jail sentence if he did not plead guilty, they said.
    If the case was treated as terrorism it could result in a sentence of up to 60 years in a maximum security prison, should he be found guilty on all six indictments.
    With co-operation, he would receive a lesser sentence of 37 to 46 months and be repatriated to the UK, where he could be released on parole and charges of "significantly damaging national security" would be dropped.
    But Clare Montgomery QC, representing the home secretary, argued no threats were made, and the extradition should go ahead.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    london
    Posts
    1,764
    Tokens
    1,055
    Habbo
    BV

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    American officials involved in this case have stated that they want to see him 'fry'

    SORRY BUT LOL

    & the NASA deserve this anyways they keep all the UFO things top secret.
    Last edited by N-Dubz; 30-07-2008 at 06:28 PM.


  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    9,773
    Tokens
    146

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by N-Dubz View Post
    American officials involved in this case have stated that they want to see him 'fry'

    SORRY BUT LOL

    & the NASA deserve this anyways they keep all the UFO things top secret.
    Lolol, far too much irony :p

    It's their fault for having rubbish protection? If they are as serious about their security as they claim they are then he shouldn't have been able to get in. They should be thanking him, what if a real terrorist got in?

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    1,005
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    OMG
    GENIUS
    GET HIM ON THE PHONE NOW
    WE HAVE PLANS TO MAKE!


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    Tokens
    3,780

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    You do have to realize this was in 2001-2002, their security probably wasn't as great as it should have been.

    I think he deserves what he gets.. if he doesn't plead guilty.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Yokohama (Japan)
    Posts
    6,499
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    he should be killed for looking for ufo information? bit harsh really.
    (゚Д゚≡゚Д゚)

    Roy: [singing] We don't need no education.
    Moss: Yes you do; you've just used a double negative

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    Tokens
    3,780

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    And you believe him? He was looking for UFO information.. that seems like a likely story when he was breaching into US Army, Navy, Air Force, and Department of Defense computers as well..

    I'm sure the US Navy and US Army keeps information on UFOs..?

    Nasa and the DOD would be the two main services that would store that kind of information, so what is his excuse for the other services?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Yokohama (Japan)
    Posts
    6,499
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well he obviously didn't do anything with the information.
    (゚Д゚≡゚Д゚)

    Roy: [singing] We don't need no education.
    Moss: Yes you do; you've just used a double negative

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    5,108
    Tokens
    3,780

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    That's like saying, "Well he hacked into one of the largest banks in the world.. but he didn't do anything with their bank information.. so it's okay.."

    No.. it isn't okay, it doesn't matter what he did with the information, he still did it/attempted it..

    That's also like saying "Well he held up a bank, but he returned the money a week later. should we just let him go?"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Yokohama (Japan)
    Posts
    6,499
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    No those examples are wrong.

    It's more like someone left a room full of information open, he walked in looked around and walked back out, then the room owner locked the room up after the man alerted them to the problem and decides to kill him, where as if the man didn't walk in an evil man could have and got information for other purposes.
    (゚Д゚≡゚Д゚)

    Roy: [singing] We don't need no education.
    Moss: Yes you do; you've just used a double negative

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •