Hmm?

I'm maybe not the only one that thinks this, but are all of the 18 massive changes negative?

Removing the Articles department because of no one reading the articles... fair, but removing it for lack of people wanting to write is wrong.

I applied to Articles department and apparently I was fired by sierk...? When I quit in reality?

So has this been in the planning for a long time or something?

Lots of questions,
Boon (Booner)

[The Professor]

You're in a vast minority, when applications opened recently there were about 4 applications that came in, and of course not all of those were of the standard we need. It also isn't really fair to let the writers continue writing the extremely high standard stuff they were putting out for an audience of one man and his dog As said in the announcement, we are aiming to keep as many of them on as possible and let them write elsewhere on the site where people are likely to read it

[Grig]

But the past articles better still be archived somewhere as honestly a lot of them are very interesting, and I'm sure the few people that come across them will read them with interest in the distant future

[Alkaz]

Im sure that the ones who do want to continue writing will join the Content department and I am sure that intime their will be some form of articles from these people aswell as Habbo content so not all is lost, just putting resources to better use where more people will benifit from their work.

[nvrspk4]

Well it depends how you say negative. I would say that some of them are definitely more positive than things closing, its things opening, or changing the way they run, things like that. So not everything is shutting down and firing though, yes, there will be some of that going on as that is an element of a restructuring.