http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost....08&postcount=2
looks like he skipped over the avoiding the filter bit, and just went straight to rude. Dunno if he got warned/infracted for it but it looks like a fail from a users point of view.
http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost....08&postcount=2
looks like he skipped over the avoiding the filter bit, and just went straight to rude. Dunno if he got warned/infracted for it but it looks like a fail from a users point of view.
I've been very critical of late but although you're right the moderator singled out here is only a trialist, so only learning![]()
he seems to have applied for all open positions o_o
would their be time for learning with that LOL
i guess he will learn sometime though.
It is actually debateable as to whether that is avoiding the filter. Fricking and fracking are allowed. I do believe Matt was going to ask nvr about this particular example. Personally I do think it goes beyond the acceptable limit.
I don't think effing is the same as fricking and fracking. I think effing is a deliberate breach of the rules.
i should get my FURRRK removed then as i mean't fork after using all those *****.
yeah i would see it as avoiding, as i don't say effing for fricken, i say it for the obvious
watch me get infracted for this LOL
you won't be in feedback because you're making a point.
Is their any forums were we are allowed to flame without being infracted? would be a good idea if you could remove the filter off one subforum. Where we can just all flame without being infracted for avoiding the filter.
The idea has been put forward many times. I can't see it being considered as flaming goes against the fundamental principles of Habbox.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!