Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 23
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    827
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Exclamation One thing I want to clear up...

    Hey,

    Ok so its an ongoing argument about which console is better... ps3, or xbox 360.

    Now its obvious that both users of either console will say theirs is better..
    But one thing they dont realise is the technology used in either console and which company made them. Now sony spend quite a bit on development of their consoles and bring some pretty good consoles out, where as microsoft have just had to find another way of making money.

    Microsoft didnt want to make the ultimate console, they just wanted more money. Now the xbox was released in 2005 in which it was the best console avaliable, but in my eyes it was rushed out, true it could play good games with better graphics ect, but it was like any othert console with a slide open disc drive, square shaped, no wireless internet built in or hdmi...

    Now sony must have played their cards right and realised that if they wait for the xbox360 to come out then see what features that has, and make their console better. They did a good job of that, which made the console the most expensive but worth the buy, where as u may aswell buy a ps2 instead of an xbox at the time.

    So nowadays you ask your friends what the xbox has better than the ps3, now the only come back they have for the xbox is the "xBox Live", now I can only guess its better because of the amount of people that go on it, now "PSN" is free and has the same performance... so how can xbl be better?

    So prices, you would probably pay more for an xbox than a playstation 3 in some circumstances, I mean, the ps3 is £250, pretty expensive but its better than buying an xbox without a blueray, having to buy a wireless adapter, bigger HDD's... PS3 is well worth the money.

    Now Id love to see someone make a valid argument for this,

    The xbox will never be better than the Playstation 3, no matter what they do.

    I will add stuff to this when I can think of more random stuff to complain about the xbox.
    Leave any comments and if its a valid comment I will leave you +rep

    Oh btw, if you have PSN, add me: Lewiie15

    Thanks for viewing

    Lew.

    Thread closed by iAdam (Forum Super Moderator); Closed to prevent inevitable arguing.
    Last edited by iAdam; 03-01-2010 at 06:40 PM.
    Im not here to be loved, I love to be hated :-}


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    12,315
    Tokens
    33,716
    Habbo
    dbgtz

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    That is your opinion but in my opinion, that is true.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    827
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Tbh alot of people says it opinion, if u think about it enough, you will know its fact

    Lew.
    Im not here to be loved, I love to be hated :-}


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,448
    Tokens
    1,400

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewiie15 View Post
    Tbh alot of people says it opinion, if u think about it enough, you will know its fact

    Lew.
    Counter argument - Sony had barely ANY time, So they just dumped parts in, And not all work together perfectly.

    Cant remember where i saw it - Google it of your too bothered..

    Both games have their advantages and disadvantages, Get over it. People have different preferences, Get over it.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    15,171
    Tokens
    1,267

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewiie15 View Post
    Hey,

    Ok so its an ongoing argument about which console is better... ps3, or xbox 360.

    Now its obvious that both users of either console will say theirs is better..
    But one thing they dont realise is the technology used in either console and which company made them. Now sony spend quite a bit on development of their consoles and bring some pretty good consoles out, where as microsoft have just had to find another way of making money.

    **** no! a company wanting to make money! Kill them now!

    Microsoft didnt want to make the ultimate console, they just wanted more money. Now the xbox was released in 2005 in which it was the best console avaliable, but in my eyes it was rushed out, true it could play good games with better graphics ect, but it was like any othert console with a slide open disc drive, square shaped, no wireless internet built in or hdmi...

    Yes, of course they want to make money, they are a company whos only purpose is to mae money, however they will do what they need to to make it. And who cares about having an open disc drive? Its just silly little features. Peraps the no wireless internet built in but thats it.

    Now sony must have played their cards right and realised that if they wait for the xbox360 to come out then see what features that has, and make their console better. They did a good job of that, which made the console the most expensive but worth the buy, where as u may aswell buy a ps2 instead of an xbox at the time.

    A lot of people arent rich. They dont care if its got blu ray or no disc tray, they want to play games and considering xbox can do everything essential that the ps3 can, its the most obvious choice for many. Your last comment i wont dignify with an answer.


    So nowadays you ask your friends what the xbox has better than the ps3, now the only come back they have for the xbox is the "xBox Live", now I can only guess its better because of the amount of people that go on it, now "PSN" is free and has the same performance... so how can xbl be better?

    From what i've heard, many servers go down and can be laggy, whilst in my experience there is no lag and the servers have only gone down once in the years ive been playing my xbox.

    So prices, you would probably pay more for an xbox than a playstation 3 in some circumstances, I mean, the ps3 is £250, pretty expensive but its better than buying an xbox without a blueray, having to buy a wireless adapter, bigger HDD's... PS3 is well worth the money.

    Some people dont care about blu ray, i dont need a wireless adapter since i have a ethernet cable and my xbox is next to my router, and i couldnt care about HDD.


    Now Id love to see someone make a valid argument for this,

    Oh snap

    The xbox will never be better than the Playstation 3, no matter what they do.

    Neither are better, its down to preferences and opinions.


    I will add stuff to this when I can think of more random stuff to complain about the xbox.
    Leave any comments and if its a valid comment I will leave you +rep

    I look forward to it.

    Oh btw, if you have PSN, add me: Lewiie15

    Thanks for viewing

    Lew.
    Answered in bold tyvm.


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Hull
    Posts
    827
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    lol, ok i like your feedback

    Lew.
    Im not here to be loved, I love to be hated :-}


  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    4,614
    Tokens
    90

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I can't believe some of your points are about the shape of the disc tray, are you serious? Who gives a **** if it is square or ejects out lol? Also the Xbox does have HDMI.

    Xbox Live is seen as better because it is £4.99 a month, so Microsoft can use this money to add more services and features and make the service run smoother. There's loads on XBL now, Sky Player, Last.FM, Twitter, Facebook, Zune etc - the features and quality make it worth £4.99 for me.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    6,071
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    My replies are in bold. I hope you take the time to read them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lewiie15 View Post
    Hey,

    sup?

    Ok so its an ongoing argument about which console is better... ps3, or xbox 360.

    no there isn't, just fanboys waging pointless rage at each other.

    Now its obvious that both users of either console will say theirs is better..

    not entirely true

    But one thing they dont realise is the technology used in either console and which company made them.

    ummm that's the point of this argument right... better technology?

    Now sony spend quite a bit on development of their consoles and bring some pretty good consoles out, where as microsoft have just had to find another way of making money.

    *sigh* Sony spent five years on developing the PS3, Microsoft has been planning the 360 since goddamn before time began (when HD came into form). I'm also pretty sure Microsoft just wants to join in this industry and have fun, they're more than welcome.

    Microsoft didnt want to make the ultimate console,

    yes they did

    they just wanted more money.

    everybody does kid, including sony, way the world works.

    Now the xbox was released in 2005 in which it was the best console avaliable, but in my eyes it was rushed out,

    emphasis on the words 'your eyes'. If anything, the 360 was more than ready for release and offered a great line up of games. It really started to pick up speed a year later, a trend we saw with the PS3.

    true it could play good games with better graphics ect, but it was like any othert console with a slide open disc drive, square shaped, no wireless internet built in or hdmi...

    HDMI wasn't even mass produced until Sony HDTVs came along (2007). I doubt it was like any other console, it was the future. It is the present.

    Now sony must have played their cards right and realised that if they wait for the xbox360 to come out then see what features that has, and make their console better.

    Sony planned the PS3 long before anything in existence, the blu-ray drive too.

    They did a good job of that, which made the console the most expensive but worth the buy, where as u may aswell buy a ps2 instead of an xbox at the time.

    LOL. NO

    So nowadays you ask your friends what the xbox has better than the ps3, now the only come back they have for the xbox is the "xBox Live", now I can only guess its better because of the amount of people that go on it, now "PSN" is free and has the same performance... so how can xbl be better?

    FOR THE LOVE OF GOD.

    http://habboxforum.com/showthread.ph...55#post6068055

    read it and lern


    So prices, you would probably pay more for an xbox than a playstation 3 in some circumstances, I mean, the ps3 is £250, pretty expensive but its better than buying an xbox without a blueray, having to buy a wireless adapter, bigger HDD's... PS3 is well worth the money.

    They're both worth the money

    Now Id love to see someone make a valid argument for this,

    The xbox will never be better than the Playstation 3, no matter what they do.

    That is the single most fanboyish thing I have heard in absolutely ages.

    I will add stuff to this when I can think of more random stuff to complain about the xbox.
    Leave any comments and if its a valid comment I will leave you +rep

    Oh btw, if you have PSN, add me: Lewiie15

    Thanks for viewing

    Lew.
    Okay, imma bite the carrot here and just totally and utterly call you out on this. You come down to console gaming with an argument I wouldn't even be caught dead with. I'm totally serious man, you're a nice guy and I can see you making some good contributions, but your head isn't in the right place.

    There is no superior console, there is no "argument about whether ps3 is better than 360", there's just bickering. I don't want to be a part of senseless bickering and I'm sure no one else would either.

    I enjoy both sides of Sony and Microsoft, and I don't see why we can't all get along fine, the videogame industry has enough problems and fanboys should be one of them.

    If anything I am sick to death of countless arguments being churned out, time and time again, where we'll see four or six members totally just churn and recycle old facts and figures in the hope of winning.

    Yes, I respect your opinion, and I respect you more of a person for expressing it. But what I can't stand in life are three things.

    1. Reality TV celebrities
    2. People who think COD4 is the best thing ever made
    3. Fuel for fanboys.

    This is one of them.

    tl;dr - SHHHHHHHHHHHH ALL OF YOU. FOR THE LAST GODDAMN TIME JUST SHHHHHH

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    1,236
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    wow.

    both consoles play games. chose your weapon of choice.

    opinions vary.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Plymouth
    Posts
    9,406
    Tokens
    1,777

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    This fanboy needs some schoolin' I'm sick of this crap so all I'm going to do is post this.

    http://www.pcvsconsole.com/compariso...60-vs-ps3-gpu/

    Xbox > PS3 - End

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •