Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 38
  1. #1
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is online now Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,000
    Tokens
    706
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default Anglo-Argentine relations futher deteriorate

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...mplacency.html



    Argentina has warned Britain it 'shouldn't be complacent' and that it would defend its sovereignty in the territorial dispute off the Falkland Islands. However, Buenos Aires insisted it did did not mean a repeat of the 1982 Falklands war. The South American country has said it will take its dispute over plans by UK firms to explore oil off the islands to the United Nations. It has announced new controls on ships heading to the islands as a result of the plans to drill for oil. The Shadow Foreign Secretary William Hague this morning said Britain should be 'very firm' and raise its profile off the islands.

    Speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, Mr Hague called for 'some sort of increased naval presence - it may just be one more ship visiting more regularly' in the region. He added: 'That kind of thing would show very clearly to Argentina - with whom, again, we want friendly relations - that we will be very firm about this. It would send a signal not to misunderstand British intentions. 'One of the things that went wrong in the 1980s is that the Argentines thought we weren't really committed to the Falkland Islands. So, we mustn't make that mistake again. Our commitment should be very clear.' However, Gordon Brown, speaking on a phone-in today, said: 'I think you will find we have made all the preparations that are necessary to make sure the Falkland Islanders are properly protected.' But he did not expect a need to send a task force to the area, saying: 'This is oil drilling that is exploration for the future.

    It is perfectly within our rights to do this.' He believed the Argentinian government understood this and that 'sensible discussions' will prevail. Two days ago, Argentina said that boats sailing from its ports to the Falklands would need a government permit, deepening a long-running row over exploration in the disputed archipelago. This comes as a British rig nears the islands and is due to start drilling next week.


    Our islands, our people, our resources so no Argentina, they are not yours. I think if they dare attack again we should immediately fire back and maybe even use air power to damage Argentine ports. The Argentines always use the Falklands issue to drum up support at home when their government is in trouble/unpopular just as the regime in the 1980s did of which our war helped collapse - anyway, Thoughts?
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 18-02-2010 at 12:21 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,183
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    We got spoken to about this in my navy drugs test and interview today. Very interesting, the ship they are saying that has been sent out there has been out there for last 11 months patrolling, so dont know why people are saying its just been sent out there. Also some other stuff but cant speak about that though, he did say if it all kicked off big time the navy could get most of the army troops removed from afgan and over to the area within 72 (not including equipment) which was intresting.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Titch View Post
    We got spoken to about this in my navy drugs test and interview today. Very interesting, the ship they are saying that has been sent out there has been out there for last 11 months patrolling, so dont know why people are saying its just been sent out there. Also some other stuff but cant speak about that though, he did say if it all kicked off big time the navy could get most of the army troops removed from afgan and over to the area within 72 (not including equipment) which was intresting.
    I'm guessing you meant 72 hours at the end? If so that's not bad. I know it wouldn't take that long to get people over there. I wish Argentina give up they will not win and they will never get the islands. So really what they are trying to do with this "Oli" stuff is a bit crazy IMO.

    @Undertaker, I agree that if they even attack and try and get the islands or stop anything related to it. We should attack back, it's our land and has been for god knows how long.
    Last edited by xxMATTGxx; 18-02-2010 at 08:56 PM.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,183
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    I'm guessing you meant 72 hours at the end? If so that's not bad. I know it wouldn't take that long to get people over there. I wish Argentina give up they will not win and they will never get the islands. So really what they are trying to do with this "Oli" stuff is a bit crazy IMO.
    They think this could be one of biggest oil reserves in world.

    EDIT: @second bit: Hopefully we do, seeing as i will be in the navy then fighting over there
    Last edited by Titch; 18-02-2010 at 08:58 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MattGarner View Post
    I'm guessing you meant 72 hours at the end? If so that's not bad. I know it wouldn't take that long to get people over there. I wish Argentina give up they will not win and they will never get the islands. So really what they are trying to do with this "Oli" stuff is a bit crazy IMO.

    @Undertaker, I agree that if they even attack and try and get the islands or stop anything related to it. We should attack back, it's our land and has been for god knows how long.
    Do you mean Oil instead of Oli?? Or am I missing something?

    Tbf I think it would be quite a laugh to send troops over just to wind up Argentina but that's just me


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,183
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Demala View Post
    Do you mean Oil instead of Oli?? Or am I missing something?

    Tbf I think it would be quite a laugh to send troops over just to wind up Argentina but that's just me
    wouldn't really be troops, the battle would be fort at see by the navy mainly. Unless it got big and had to fight on land

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Titch View Post
    wouldn't really be troops, the battle would be fort at see by the navy mainly. Unless it got big and had to fight on land
    Sorry me being 'non-army' By troops I mean the navy/anyone in the army

    Not trying to be ignorant, but another falklands war would make a great call of duty
    Last edited by AgnesIO; 18-02-2010 at 09:05 PM.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,601
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Demala View Post
    Do you mean Oil instead of Oli?? Or am I missing something?

    Tbf I think it would be quite a laugh to send troops over just to wind up Argentina but that's just me
    I meant Oil.

    Quote Originally Posted by Titch View Post
    wouldn't really be troops, the battle would be fort at see by the navy mainly. Unless it got big and had to fight on land
    Sure would be, the sea and the air They will probably think they can win but they just don't know how good we really are.


    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Kent
    Posts
    4,183
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Demala View Post
    Sorry me being 'non-army' By troops I mean the navy/anyone in the army

    Not trying to be ignorant, but another falklands war would make a great call of duty
    lol haha, our navy is very much seprate from the army now when not on missions. We are Still regarded as the best navy in the world and most navys in the world are based on ours

    Haha would make a great COD, they actually use xbox 360 controllers in army and navy for handling mini aircraft for salavlence over war zone.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    leeds
    Posts
    3,889
    Tokens
    1,603

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I find it quite funny that you despise any soldiers being in place in Iraq/Afghanistan yet you feel its necessary to instigate a war with another country over a much smaller problem.

    Seems rather pointless, when if people actually communicated with each other instead of bigging themselves up.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •