Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 22
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default CAMERON MILK SNATCHER

    Thought this was pretty amusing to be honest, Tories getting into power and cutting the milk already. Even today people still carry on about "Thatcher, Thatcher, Milk Snatcher" when she took a similar move after coming into government. As for my opinion on it, if there's no real health benefits then it may as well be cut, will make a sizeable saving too.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10904958

    Quote Originally Posted by BBC News
    The government is considering cutting a UK-wide scheme offering free milk to under-five-year-olds in nursery or daycare, the BBC has learned. UK health minister Anne Milton set out the proposals in a letter to Scottish public health minister Shona Robison.

    She said there was no evidence the scheme improved health and it was too expensive to run.

    Instead, the government was considering increasing the value of Healthy Start vouchers for the poorest families.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    2,163
    Tokens
    44
    Habbo
    HabbaJabba

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    "She said there was no evidence the scheme improved health and it was too expensive to run."

    I thought Milk was nutritious? The Government try and get teenagers and kids to be more healthy but end up cutting milk for under-five-year-olds?

    I support Labour so I don't agree with cutting milk.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    No doubt Milk does have nutrients in it but they're saying it doesn't improve you're health in the long term and therefore isn't cost effective, not that milk isn't healthy.

    It's not going ahead anyway;
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-10904958

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Wales
    Posts
    10,595
    Tokens
    25
    Habbo
    Catzsy

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Well I guess they might as well as they have cut 700 school refurbishment schemes so they can get used to being
    deprived and having to study in delapidated buildings from an early age!

  5. #5
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    29,959
    Tokens
    4,497
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dean View Post
    "She said there was no evidence the scheme improved health and it was too expensive to run."

    I thought Milk was nutritious? The Government try and get teenagers and kids to be more healthy but end up cutting milk for under-five-year-olds?

    I support Labour so I don't agree with cutting milk.
    You don't agree with cutting milk because you support Labour? in other words, you don't actually have a problem with milk being cut but do because its the blue party and not the red party cutting the milk. Talk about tribalism.

    Quote Originally Posted by Catzsy View Post
    Well I guess they might as well as they have cut 700 school refurbishment schemes so they can get used to being
    deprived and having to study in delapidated buildings from an early age!
    Well we have Labour to thank for that!

    In regards to this thread though which is some government-food related history i'll bring in because some might find it interesting. Most people don't realise but back in 1945 and afterwards, this country was still on rations when most of Europe and the world was back to normal food production/exchange - at the same time Prime Minister Atlee was giving away millions to Germany (in aid and part of the Marshall Plan) afterwards which was ironic in a way, because Germany then overtook Great Britain in a number of fields and Britains decline wasn't reversed until the 1980s.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 08-08-2010 at 10:53 AM.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    7,177
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    12,726
    Tokens
    14,846

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nixt View Post
    And so it shouldn't. I used to love my milk


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Nottingham
    Posts
    7,752
    Tokens
    756
    Habbo
    katie.pricejorda

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nixt View Post
    already been posted

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    7,177
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jordy View Post
    already been posted
    Oh yeah my bad
    Benedictus qui venit in nomine Domini

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,807
    Tokens
    0

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    YIn regards to this thread though which is some government-food related history i'll bring in because some might find it interesting. Most people don't realise but back in 1945 and afterwards, this country was still on rations when most of Europe and the world was back to normal food production/exchange - at the same time Prime Minister Atlee was giving away millions to Germany (in aid and part of the Marshall Plan) afterwards which was ironic in a way, because Germany then overtook Great Britain in a number of fields and Britains decline wasn't reversed until the 1980s.
    Germany overtook Britain not because of the relatively small amount of aid that we gave to them but because of the European Economic Community, which gave significant growth to all of the 6 founding states, and the decline of British empire. Britain's decline had little to do with the amount of aid we were giving to Germany. In fact you've said "as part of the Marshall Plan" which isn't true at all. The Marshall Plan was an American based scheme (which we didn't contribute to) to give money to the whole of Europe, not just Germany, in order to stop the spread of Communism. We actually received vast amounts of money from the Marshall Plan, not the other way around.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •