Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    30,064
    Tokens
    1,124
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default Farage challenges Cameron to debate

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...#disqus_thread

    The time will never be right for David Cameron to hold a referendum on the EU

    The Prime Minister should explain why Britain can’t vote on continued membership of the failing European Union



    Nigel Farage: 'I challenge the Prime Minister to have an open debate with me on why he believes we must stay part of this failing, corrupt EU. The future of our nation is at stake. Mr Cameron, you have my phone number'

    Quote Originally Posted by Nigel Farage, the Telegraph
    I have had enough of being told that we will have an EU referendum “when the time is right”. The time has come for a real debate: I challenge the Prime Minister to debate with me why he will not give us a say on our relationship with the European Union.

    Anyone following David Cameron’s recent twists and turns on the EU could be forgiven for feeling dizzy. At one time, there was a “cast-iron guarantee” of a referendum. Then, last year, he three-line-whipped Conservative MPs to oppose the idea of holding one. Events last week did nothing to add clarity. On Friday in Brussels, with Angela Merkel looming over him, we were told that there would be no referendum. But 48 hours later, in an article in The Sunday Telegraph, he suggested that a referendum might be a possibility, though not just yet.

    There is one note of total consistency. On at least half a dozen occasions, the Prime Minister has been clear that there will not be – must not be – a choice of whether we stay in or leave the EU.

    The explanation is that it is in our interests to remain a member, so it does not matter what voters think. It’s a case of “I, David Cameron, have made up my mind.” This assertion, shared by almost the entire political class, must be questioned in an open debate. Those of us who have dared to challenge the consensus have been mocked and derided, but opinion polls now show that the British people do not want to be part of a political union.

    The Prime Minister overstates the benefits of EU membership. I believe we would be better off out. My parents’ generation voted to remain a part of a Common Market which they believed to be a free-trade agreement that would not impinge on our rights of self-government. We were conned in 1975 and we must not allow that to be repeated today.

    Mr Cameron claims that 3.5 million British jobs depend on us remaining part of the European Union. This comment always goes undisputed. It is based on the number of jobs dependent on exports to the EU and assumes that leaving the union would mean no further business between us and the EU – an incredibly weak, illogical argument. In 2010, the EU sold us £50 billion worth of goods more than we sold them. In short, they need us more than we need them. There is no chance of Mercedes, for example, refusing to sell us cars if we amicably divorce ourselves from political union.

    The EU is a Seventies solution to a Fifties problem. The world has moved on since the “Common Market”, with World Trade Organisation agreements guaranteeing trading terms. Countries like Norway, Switzerland and even Mexico have free trade deals with the EU. Trade will continue as it does now with consumers making their choices in the marketplace. We are the world’s fifth-largest trading nation and yet, incredibly, we are banned from negotiating our own trade deals around the world. Ukip believes the Commonwealth is a good place to start, with its shared ties, common law, common language and a growth rate that outstrips our European neighbours.

    But the benefits of leaving do not stop there. One of the most contentious issues in UK politics is immigration. With new arrivals running at 600,000 a year, the public demands that something must be done. But there is a problem. EU membership means that we have an open-door policy for our poorer European neighbours and a benefits system that encourages people to come here.

    I was asked last week what I thought about new figures showing that Britain was the favoured destination for asylum seekers. I replied that 14,000 asylum seekers make up a small percentage of the total number of immigrants. Only by leaving the EU can we control our borders and apply a sensible and fair work permit scheme. My party is often accused of being anti-immigration. We are not. Work permits would allow talented, qualified people from all over the world a chance to contribute to the future of this country. Australia does it and so should we.

    The other thing I am often asked about is human rights. Whether the issue is votes for prisoners or the failure to deport criminals on the spurious grounds of a “right to a family life”, our Government and courts are impotent. Highly paid, politicised lawyers will tell you that the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg is separate to the EU. That is no longer true. EU membership demands acceptance of all ECHR judgments and the EU intends to become a signatory in its own right, as part of the Lisbon Treaty. While we remain part of the EU, the chances of us wrestling back British judicial powers are slim.

    I am pessimistic, however, that any of these serious issues will be addressed. My prediction is that Mr Cameron will be given one small, paltry concession from the EU over workers’ rights and will then present this as a victory of renegotiation. A referendum promise in the next Tory election manifesto on any “new package” would leave us exactly where we are now, still governed by Brussels, still unable to make our own laws and still paying £50 million a day for the “privilege” of belonging to this undemocratic club.

    Once again, I challenge the Prime Minister to have an open debate with me on why he believes we must stay part of this failing, corrupt EU. The future of our nation is at stake. Mr Cameron, you have my phone number.

    Nigel Farage is the leader of Ukip
    Imagine that debate, but sadly we won't have it - the pro EU politicians absolutely hate any light being shed on the European Union via debate because any support for the 'project' is built on silly claims such as 'it good for our economy' - an argument that has, of course, been blown out of the water in recent years (even before the crisis hit the Euro/EU zone was a disaster with 40% youth unemployment).

    But yes, for anyone interested in current affairs (I would say EU matters, but it affects virtually everything) it's a good summary piece by Farage for the pro-Conservative Telegraph. And that's another sign the tide is turning.

    Thoughts as to what will happen in the next few years?

    Personally I think the 'project' is beyond repair and we're witnessing a slow motion collapse that occured with the Soviet Union, political union (the only solution) was voted against by around 74% of Germans in a recent opinion poll - and Germany has historically been the most pro-'project' nation on the continent.

    We ought to focus on selling the potentials of leaving the EU more though, such as being able to greatly expand trade links with the Commonwealth nations such as India/Singapore/Malaya/New Zealand/Hong Kong/South Africa/Kenya + countless more - a far bigger market than the EU will ever be, and a market which is predicted to rapidly grow whereas the EU is only going to stagnate. The future is bright if we grasp it.
    Last edited by -:Undertaker:-; 05-07-2012 at 11:45 PM.


    And if you wanna buy me flowers
    Just go ahead now
    And if you like to talk for hours
    Just go ahead now


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Farage for PM *waves flag* I find him really interesting to listen to. A real master debater, if you will Who else would be more fitting to go against Cameron than Farage? He's actually involved in EU politics as part of his job and understands it quite well. He understands the pros and cons of it (mostly cons, obviously) and actually has a strong passion for Europe - he doesn't hate it, he feels the Union is restrictive and culturally, economically, socially and politically damaging in some respects.

    Perhaps Cameron may say no simply because he doesn't want to be used as a mop, for Farage will surely wipe the floor with him

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    South Wales
    Posts
    8,753
    Tokens
    3,746

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I can see Farage getting extremely frustrated with Cameron and with good reason. It's as if Cameron has blocked any ideas/suggestions from anyone from a smaller party, which is a shame.

    Also if they have a debate I hope it's televised... like everywhere.
    "There are only two important days in your life: the day you are born, and the day you find out why."
    Mark Twain


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •