Recently, a lot of high profile celebrities such as Lady Gaga, Kanye West and Kim Kardashian, to name a few, have been getting harsh criticism by organisations like PETA, the public and their peers for wearing real fur coats.
"Tell PETA my mink is dragging on the floor" - Kanye West's 'Cold'
Of course the debate of fur in fashion has been going on for a LONG time, but it's one that I have never really thought about. I used to conditionally think it was bad to wear real fur in the name of animal rights etc, but the recent attention and debate surrounding celebrities I am a great admirer of (Kanye and Gaga) has made me question what I really think about the matter.
I expect most will say it's bad and cruel to animals, and so did I. But then I thought of the leather that covers my couch and is used to make my shoes and belts, the woolly jumpers many of us wear in winter time and the ivory used to put the keys on my piano. Not to mention all the food I eat from animals every single day.
So I can't help but question my initial beliefs now with one question... what's the difference? Is it just that we've been led by the media to believe that fur coats are bad and wrong, or is it a deep rooted sense of jealousy because those coats are so expensive that most of us will likely never afford one? I mean, we're happy enough to support stores like Primark by purchasing cheap clothes that are made by starving children in awful conditions in third world countries. It's just hypocritical, isn't it?
This is not intended to be a debate about any celebrities in particular, nor about PETA. Of course these things and people can and should be used as examples to support your argument, but we are talking about the principle of wearing fur in general.














