http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/he...the-coldc.html
Damn, though it's looking like a few more years will be needed at minimum before it's potentially rolled out.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/he...the-coldc.html
Damn, though it's looking like a few more years will be needed at minimum before it's potentially rolled out.
Very interesting read. Thanks for posting.
It's not been tested on humans, so for all we know it could go directly the same route as Thalidomide. We can't put any hope into this just yet, I'm afraid.
Whilst I quite agree that this is likely yet another red herring in the search for a proper cancer cure, I think the important difference may be the trial cost - it's so comparatively low that with proper circulation it could be found in donation money alone, and then it's down to Professor Magnus (cool name) to sort out the patenting issue, which would allow if not entice actual pharmaceutical companies to invest in it large-scale. That of course would only be necessary if it proved at all viable, but if it didn't then £2m to eliminate one path and narrow the field would still be worthwhile in terms of scientific discovery
So glad to hear this news, usually it's "waking up gives you cancer" "blinking gives you cancer". About time cancer deserved good news.
I hope it works then people won't have to lose their dad's or mums or any of the family to this horrible thing called cancer.
Bringing you the news no one else does!