Nasa - The Great Moon Landing Hoax.

[Explorator]

Hey, Earlier today, i was watching a documentary on the first man moon landing. It was saying how it's not possible, because of a few ways, and they did have quite a bit of evidence for it to be staged in a studio. Personally i don't think this theory is true, and there is plenty of counter-evidence for it. It actually intrigued me quite a bit so i decided to go to google. This webpage is something from 2001, but it still has lots of information about it, if you want to read it. Click Here

But anyways, apparently in the US, there is many people who don't believe in the moon landing because they think that the technology in 1696 was too prehistoric to get to our near neighbor. What do you think? Could Neil Armstrong's first steps on the moon be only the steps on some studio sand? At the end of the day, wouldn't it be easier to build a rocket and go to the moon instead of spending years staging it? (pun)

What do you think?

-Sam

[xxMATTGxx]

I do believe NASA went to the moon and that Neil and Buzz did actually land and walk on it. I don't see why they would lie about it.

They could go and do it right now if they wanted to but they've already done it. Although I do believe NASA are thinking about going back to the moon and even setting up a base as a "stepping stone" to other parts of space.

http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/9/36...-space-station

[tm]

I thought people who thought the moon landings were a hoax got left in the last decade, at least they should have been. Do these same people think electricity is a magic trick and that witches exist? There's overwhelming and indisputable* evidence we went to the moon as well as the personal reports and experiences of those who were actually there. All of the so-called 'proof' that it was a hoax has already been discredited, and any that hasn't been made up yet will be too.

* Some people will dispute anything, no matter how indisputable for a variety of reasons. They should get help from a psychiatrist.

[-:Undertaker:-]

I don't see why they would lie about it.

The Cold War.

But my personal opinion, it probably happened.

[Kardan]

Well, if the moon landing happened in 1696, like you say in your original post, then it probably was fake!

I reckon it happened, there's enough evidence to disprove each theory.

[Stephen!]

The Myth busters episode explains all. Wasn't a hoax.

[Zak]

It just wasn't a hoax was it.

People can come up with conspiracies all they want, like who shot JFK? Lets face it, it was lone gunman Lee Harvey Oswald. Whether there were underlying mafia reasons as to why he did it now that's another matter.

The US government would have no reason to lie about it to be honest.. and if it wasn't real, major leaks would have emerged by now.

[Chippiewill]

It wasn't a hoax and this is what I say to people who believe otherwise:

[-:Undertaker:-]

The US government would have no reason to lie about it to be honest..

The Cold War.

[Seikou]

i really don't believe it was a hoax, would be pretty dissapointing if it was