Discover Habbo's history
Treat yourself with a Secret Santa gift.... of a random Wiki page for you to start exploring Habbo's history!
Happy holidays!
Celebrate with us at Habbox on the hotel, on our Forum and right here!
Join Habbox!
One of us! One of us! Click here to see the roles you could take as part of the Habbox community!


View Poll Results: Have you signed?

Voters
7. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    4 57.14%
  • No

    3 42.86%
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,916
    Tokens
    8,419
    Habbo
    maken

    Latest Awards:

    Default Ian Duncan Smith - What do you think? Sign the Petition!

    Iain Duncan Smith: Iain Duncan Smith to live on £53 a week. Yes/No?

    Sign the petition here:
    http://www.change.org/en-GB/petition...e-on-53-a-week



  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Country
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,546
    Tokens
    6,341
    Habbo
    MikeyFusion

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Yes, I've signed the petition already.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,817
    Tokens
    63,679
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I don't see the point. It's meant to show him that it's not possible to live on £53 a week but it quite clearly is since so many people do it. Unemployment benefits are there to tide you over until you get back into work, not to act as a salary so that you don't have to
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,916
    Tokens
    8,419
    Habbo
    maken

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikey View Post
    Yes, I've signed the petition already.
    Nice one!

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    I don't see the point. It's meant to show him that it's not possible to live on £53 a week but it quite clearly is since so many people do it. Unemployment benefits are there to tide you over until you get back into work, not to act as a salary so that you don't have to
    You have a fair point, however he claims that he could easily do it... Thing is a lot of people who do, have to find cash-in-hand jobs.



  5. #5
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    29,959
    Tokens
    4,497
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    IDS is one of the few ministers in this government with any common sense, he's spot on.

    It simply goes back to this; why should people working on lower wages have the same standard of living to those who aren't working and are on benefits? I find that unjust, unfair and it simply serves to encourage welfare dependency as whats the point of working when you can life fairly comfortable off the state?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FlyingJesus View Post
    I don't see the point. It's meant to show him that it's not possible to live on £53 a week but it quite clearly is since so many people do it. Unemployment benefits are there to tide you over until you get back into work, not to act as a salary so that you don't have to
    Reminds me of Helen Goodman Labour MP for Bishop Auckland. She survived on £18 a week which is what she believes constituents will have after the deductions in benefits such as the bedroom "tax". It's do-able, especially when you consider they are there to tide you over until you get back to work.

    For some reason, we must all have the same standard of living with luxuries, when it makes no sense to have this mentality for essentially doing nothing. It's difficult to get a job in this climate, but not too difficult that it's impossible to find a job. As long as you have the basics such as food and shelter, £56 is plenty provided you can make the necessary sacrifices.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,916
    Tokens
    8,419
    Habbo
    maken

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    IDS is one of the few ministers in this government with any common sense, he's spot on.

    It simply goes back to this; why should people working on lower wages have the same standard of living to those who aren't working and are on benefits? I find that unjust, unfair and it simply serves to encourage welfare dependency as whats the point of working when you can life fairly comfortable off the state?
    I do actually agree with you, but some families who cannot work etc... etc... are also penalised. With valid reasons for not being able to work (severe disabilities etc...)

    Those who abuse the system, get rid, gladly get rid. Those who genuinely can't survive, that's something we need to work on.



  8. #8
    -:Undertaker:-'s Avatar
    -:Undertaker:- is offline Habbox Hall of Fame Inductee
    Former Rare Values Manager
    HabboxForum Top Poster


    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Jerez, the Kingdom of Spain
    Country
    Spain
    Posts
    29,959
    Tokens
    4,497
    Habbo
    -:overtaker:-

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Demi View Post
    I do actually agree with you, but some families who cannot work etc... etc... are also penalised. With valid reasons for not being able to work (severe disabilities etc...)

    Those who abuse the system, get rid, gladly get rid. Those who genuinely can't survive, that's something we need to work on.
    Oh yes, but then look at that aswell - the other month the government was going to test all those on disabled benefits and guess what happened a few weeks/a month before the tests were due to start? 900,000 odd people suddenly stopped claiming disability benefits.

    And that's such an improvement from just means testing people. Personally i'm in favour of a voucher system being introduced.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    England
    Posts
    1,916
    Tokens
    8,419
    Habbo
    maken

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by -:Undertaker:- View Post
    Oh yes, but then look at that aswell - the other month the government was going to test all those on disabled benefits and guess what happened a few weeks/a month before the tests were due to start? 900,000 odd people suddenly stopped claiming disability benefits.

    And that's such an improvement from just means testing people. Personally i'm in favour of a voucher system being introduced.
    Never-the-less, I would love him to survive on that money.
    Most politicians are paid TOO MUCH, their money could be used elsewhere.



  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,817
    Tokens
    63,679
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    People who can't work through disability get far far more than £53 a week (4real you can get ridonkulous amounts depending on the severity), so saying that basic unemployment benefits aren't enough because you might be off for medical reasons isn't a valid argument
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •