Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    17,016
    Tokens
    34,327

    Latest Awards:

    Default Do you think "soft subjects" exist in education?

    Do you think in school/college/university there are some subjects/qualifications that are considered less impressive/worthy than others?

    For example, Cambridge University says they are extremely unlikely to accept students that have 2 or more "soft" A-Levels, including Accounting, Design and Technology, Film Studies, Information and Communication Technology, Media Studies, Photography, and Sports studies.

    Do you agree with this? What subjects do you view in this way? Why?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    4,082
    Tokens
    2,126

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    media and film i always hear about as being less academic

    if u want to get into a top uni like cambridge then it matters a lot but the more average places its not a big deal
    i havent done any of those subjects so i have no idea if they are easy

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Middlesbrough, England
    Posts
    9,336
    Tokens
    10,837

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    There are but I don't think there should be. To me, education is more about skills you learn rather than necessarily knowledge content and soft subjects still demonstrate valuable life skills so I'm not sure why they're seen as less impressive.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    5,492
    Tokens
    21,741

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    I think photography isn't worthy for things which don't include it.

    The only subjects that I feel are the hardest that I do are drama, maths and science.
    i used to put the names of my favourite singers here... then i realised nobody cared

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    14,107
    Tokens
    4,179

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Erghhhh yes there are but I'm sure the russell group call them facilitating/non facilitating subjects. The only reason for the division is because skills in English Literature for example, are supposedly able to be transferred to a much larger variety of subjects than, let's say food technology. I don't think it's down to impressiveness, just how easily transferable the skills are. (ok only just finding out transferable has one r??)

    I won't deny some subjects are certainly much harder to gain high marks in than others, but if a person wants to do ''soft'' subjects because they enjoy them and want to study something related to their ''soft'' subjects at uni then they should go for it. I've seen this discussion come up many a time on thestudentroom forum and for anyone who panicks they've chosen ''soft'' subjects, the best piece of advice they give is "Well wouldn't you rather get an A in a subject that you enjoy albeit "soft", than let's say get an E at a subject that's "hard" and you never wanted to do?"
    /

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,323
    Tokens
    8,981

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    God, yeah. I find that art is a pretty useless subject and just fun for us to draw on a bit of paper. and chck paint around the room.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    24,818
    Tokens
    64,172
    Habbo
    FlyingJesus

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Travel and tourism
    | TWITTER |



    Blessed be
    + * + * + * +

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    7,993
    Tokens
    1,967
    Habbo
    Jurv

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    no i don't believe soft subjects exist. i suppose you could say there are less academic subjects but i don't think they should be treated any differently. it all depends on the person and what they're planning to do with the qualifications afterwards. obvs if you want to do something that requires you going to a uni to do a course that specialises in maths or something you're not, or shouldn't have chosen to do one of the less academic subjects as you can't really relate film, media, photography, whatever to any of that (i don't think? lol). but if you're planning on going to a uni to do a course that specialises in one of the less academic course then it's fine

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    England, UK
    Posts
    12,315
    Tokens
    33,951
    Habbo
    dbgtz

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Yes there are soft subjects, including every single BTEC which has ever existed. I think there are subjects which will always hold more prestige, namely maths, English and the sciences. You can see the first two's prestige demonstrated in most places where jobs or universities require a fair grade in them. Then there is a middle ground whereby they will get you in a lot of things, but additionally some restrict you from doing otherwise.

    I wouldn't go as far as to say soft subjects are less impressive (unless it's a BTEC vs GCSE equivalent kind of comparison), but they will probably only impress those who have a direct link to the subject e.g. photography the subject and a photographers etc.

    Grammar throughout that was probably poor so I do apologise.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    4,746
    Tokens
    26,295
    Habbo
    Daltron

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Yes because at Uni I doing a double degree BA / LLB.

    My BA subjects are a freaking walk in the park, calling them soft would be an insult to soft subjects.
    Subjects in my LLB schedule are VERY hard.

    ---


    Also during High School the NSW Government ranks different subjects on the difficulty ie. a 90 in Early Childhood is ranked considerably lower that say a 90 in Extension Mathematics which in turn pushes up or down your overall state rank.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •