Douglas Murray makes a fantastic argument for *controlled* immigration at Oxford

[-:Undertaker:-]

Let's try again and see if I have any replies on this one rather than pitiful nit picking over a Telegraph headline.

He debunks pretty much most of the pro-mass immigration arguments, from employment to pensions. Pretty much exactly what I post on every single thread but which he puts in a much better manner. Well worth a watch and I would be interested to see the responses to his argument from those who support open borders as opposed to what I and Murray argue which is that it should be limited and controlled. Godfrey Bloom also spoke at the debate and made an argument FOR pro-controlled immigration which can be seen here.

His [Douglas Murray] concluding definition of what Britain is and what British values are is superb from around 9 minutes in which - if you only fancy watching a part of the video/s, is the bit I am most impressed by. But out of the two Douglas makes the best comprehensive case that I would like to see somebody on here try to counter in a sensible and rational manner because it's pretty much what I say on this topic.

Thoughts?