Naming Scammers Campaign

[Shrlurp]

If You Read My First Post It Says, Sufficient Proof.

[ReviewDude]

If You Read My First Post It Says, Sufficient Proof.

Define sufficient proof? It's so, so very easy to edit a screenshot, or fake a testimony.

[:Jamie]

If You Read My First Post It Says, Sufficient Proof.

Can easily be faked end of.

[micky.blue.eyes]

You'll never be allowed to name scammer, just accept it.
It'll cause too many arguements and ruin reputations.

You're all saying that you'll notice if proof is faked or not, this already shows that the system will fail because you can easily fake evidence and people won't notice, so you're basically saying if you can't tell the evidence is fake then it's real.

You won't get a trial because you all act in a perfect way to proof the system works, once it's accepted people will abuse it.
Or worse, people will abuse it right away and the system won't be accepted but too much harm has been done and some people lost their trustability.

[JackBuddy]

It's like the fact that you can buy rep, but not return it.

[ReviewDude]

It's like the fact that you can buy rep, but not return it.

How is that anything to do with anything?

[Buzle]

I support but dont at the same time.

Cos you would HAVE to HAVE proof, like caught on tape.

Bahh, I think that when people do trades, they should record it.

[Royal]

I think, your rule should follow but I agree with Jamie and you so, how a about post a scammers name but you can only do it if you have proof?

[Kieeran]

i have a statement in my sig but i agree.

[Cwmbran]

Define sufficient proof? It's so, so very easy to edit a screenshot, or fake a testimony.

It would actually quite hard to edit a screenshot to make it actually look real as you need to have the correct colours in the correct place, same type of font. If you take a screeshot of anyplace in runescape then zoom into it you will see each individual pixel, I'm not saying it can't be done but it would take about a hour.
So say we did a trade and it all went well and I decided to accuse you of scamming me I would have to make everyone believe me that and make up some rubbish that the screenshots are taking ages to upload, people would figure out whats happend.

You won't get a trial because you all act in a perfect way to proof the system works, once it's accepted people will abuse it.
Or worse, people will abuse it right away and the system won't be accepted but too much harm has been done and some people lost their trustability.

Are you psychic?

I think, your rule should follow but I agree with Jamie and you so, how a about post a scammers name but you can only do it if you have proof?

Yes, maybe create a thread where you could post the names of people who scammed along with video/picture evidence and maybe have a nuetral person watching the trade.