the debate is all the conspiracy's people believe in, although I don't.Originally Posted by Professor-Alex
with the towers, i think the video shows it all really, nothing more to it.
I know people are saying "could more lives be saved", I don't think so, if anything a lot more could of been lost, because if the people on united 93 didn't fight back then I could guarantee that the death toll would be a lot higher.
Results 41 to 50 of 282
-
-
Originally Posted by Alan
i say watch that video
-
13-04-2007, 01:11 PM #43
The website ... Originally Posted by Publicised
His point number 2:
If they killed the makers of Loose Change, it would create them more problems. It would cause a lot of problems - "someone said america did it, and he was murdered the next day". Doesnt look good does it?
The guy who owns that site looks like some sad 2 year old kid, who thinks he is always right.
All the idiot talked about was $20 notes? WOW!!! >.>
He didn't answer any of the things or debunk anything on the pentagon?
That idiot knows he is wrong or doesn't have any answers.
Sad moron :]
-
the windsor building in madrid burned for 22 hours yet did not collapse
yet the trade centres burned for 2 hours and collapsed
sceince cant prove any of it!!!!!!!!!!!
-
13-04-2007, 01:18 PM #45
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 24,817
- Tokens
- 63,679
- Habbo
- FlyingJesus
You are then, I take it, a conspiracy theorist.. Originally Posted by ksoz
Can anyone explain why the US government would want to do this?
Can someone tell me how it's possible to get an entire government, the various special forces of the US, the emergency services and many others to stay quiet about something like this?
Can I get an answer as to how if it really was the US government, why there were no messages from the Taliban and other suspects claiming innocence?
-
on the security video released (only a few frames) it shows an explosion at the pentagon but no plane Originally Posted by micky.blue.eyes
I like this topic and I believe there is some kind of conspiracy, I don't know who did it and I don't think I want to know, but the people who did it are very clever. Maybe there were some insiders in the twin towers who could plant explosives, but there were explosives (as shown on most videos).
I agree with the people who said that every time something dramatic happens people will look for things to base a consperacy theory on, but there are just too many things here which aren't right.
Because it didn't happen the way it's told.
(Added some stuff in green.
)
Other points:
- A third tower collapsed but it wasn't struck by a plane or even burning.
- If the government has nothing to do with it (or other powerfull people), why won't the government release videos from security cameras they took from cameras aimed at the pentagon and other videos?
- The police in helicopters were ordered not to save people from the building and to get away from the building. (I think it was the police, the video will tell you this)
- The twin towers fell after about 10 minutes, other buildings burned for a much longer time and never fell down.
- The twin towers were build to survive these fires.
I can't be bothered to type more points, just watch the video.
edit:
Can anyone explain why the US government would want to do this? to make a time of terror for everyone giving
trust to the goverments to do something about it, to cause widespread panic leaving all blame on the people the us governent want dead,
Can someone tell me how it's possible to get an entire government, the various special forces of the US, the
emergency services and many others to stay quiet about something like this?
they simply didnt tell them
Can I get an answer as to how if it really was the US government, why there were no messages from the Taliban and other suspects claiming innocence?
the taliban after something like this happened would claim it was them, to make thereselves look like the most powerful terrorist forcesLast edited by Tiuhdur; 13-04-2007 at 01:23 PM.
Owner Of The-Red-Help-CenterI became Productions staff on the 28/1/07I became Events Organiser Trialist on 22/2/07Final Fantasy - Square Enix rulesTo Zanarkand:To Zanarkand - Orchestra:I owe rep to: X:RiX:X
-
Exactly. I agree with all them points, especially the last one. It would have done more damage to the US Government if the Taliban hadn't claimed they'd done it, because then people really would be pointing the finger at the US.
It's basically impossible that the US could have done it and kept it secret. If the US had done it, it would have meant hundreds or thousands of people involved - and no way would all of them have kept quiet.
Originally Posted by FlyingJesus
Hello
-
they could easily keep it under wraps if only the top people knew
Owner Of The-Red-Help-CenterI became Productions staff on the 28/1/07I became Events Organiser Trialist on 22/2/07Final Fantasy - Square Enix rulesTo Zanarkand:To Zanarkand - Orchestra:I owe rep to: X:RiX:X
-
maddox is never wrong. Originally Posted by ksoz
just because parrells exist it doesn't mean that they automatically lead to the governments involvement with 9/11. people are just clutching at loose strings to try & get answers. but i think it needs to stop; fair enough people did die, but isn't it better to let the dead rest than keep going over 'theories' that in the end prove nothing.
-
13-04-2007, 01:29 PM #50
Luckily, not everyone thinks like you. Originally Posted by Publicised
Well, lets go around murdering people, and say "STHU M8. LET THEM REST IN PEACE. THEY PROBS DIED OF NATURAL CAUSES. STHU WIV UR THEORIES THAT THEY WERE MURDERED".
^^^ My reply in red. Originally Posted by FlyingJesus
Last edited by Seatherny; 13-04-2007 at 01:35 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts