The New Moderation Changes.

[jesus]

They will never be happy - whatever management do. You know what I mean...

Sure do homeboy.

So do you agree with the lack of warning PMs, or not? Why do you think automatic bans are a good idea? I dislike posts where people do not back up their statements, it makes them seem like they are following others blindly.
I am disagreeing because my opinion happens to go against the implementation of new systems. Not because I have anything against management. In a recent conversation with MAD I told him I thought, on the whole, Habbox were doing fine but occasionally decisions were made that, to me, seem stupid. This decision happens to be one of them.

I neither agree or disagree with the lack of warning PMs. I'd have to see how things are in the long-run to make a judgement on whether it was a good idea or not, which is why i haven't justified my opinions on this as well as the auto-banning.

I do know what you mean by the concept of 'if it's not broken, don't fix it' - I usually agree and I can see why some members might be in disagreement. But from my point of view, it makes the system a lot easier. Not only this but the other changes that you don't know about and I probably cannot mention. That might be why I'm in agreement to it and other users aren't.

[Slowpoke]

Also, what if you get a handful of unfair warnings/infractions and get banned/cautioned? You'll have to go through a ton of trouble to get unbanned/uncautioned when it won't be your fault in the first place. It takes atleast 5 days for them to unban you these days... Thats very unfair and I can see it happening a lot.

You would never get a 'handful' of unfair warnings since every infraction/warning is checked by a SMod/Admin before it becomes active. Yes, the odd one or two slip through the net but that's what the "Report Unfair Infractions" thread is for. Also, sending an email to Habbox (contact us) is hardly a "ton" of trouble.

[Neversoft]

You would never get a 'handful' of unfair warnings since every infraction/warning is checked by a SMod/Admin before it becomes active. Yes, the odd one or two slip through the net but that's what the "Report Unfair Infractions" thread is for. Also, sending an email to Habbox (contact us) is hardly a "ton" of trouble.

I got 3 unfair warnings yesterday mate.

Oh, and it is a ton of trouble because they never reply. :rolleyes:

[FlyingJesus]

The highest amount of infractions I've had at one time is 2 with 4 warnings. :S

You were permed for like 3 years lol

Anyway, I don't get why we don't get a PM for warnings - I'd prefer to as otherwise I'm not being warned at all, and am likely to continue as I was :S also can someone who's knowledgeable of such things let me know in what way we'll be receiving less infractions as it says in the announcement? What are the actual changes to moderation that we can look out for?

[Kardan]

You would never get a 'handful' of unfair warnings since every infraction/warning is checked by a SMod/Admin before it becomes active. Yes, the odd one or two slip through the net but that's what the "Report Unfair Infractions" thread is for. Also, sending an email to Habbox (contact us) is hardly a "ton" of trouble.

And if you get unfairly banned how can you use the thread?

[Antony]

I don't see why we can't be informed via PM if you are given a warning / infraction, I for one do not automatically check my User CP as soon as I log onto the forum, and don't do it often enough, the PM would highlight that you have been given an infraction/warning and make you aware.

[@xP]

Sorry Corey but he doesn't spam. There is no rule against making lots of posts in one day. All of Jamie's posts contribute to the topic at hand so all his posts are justified. Spam is if someone went around posting, "LOL" - "YEH" etc. Jamies posts are lengthy and as I said, he's always contributing.

Oh sorry, he posts:

LOL, that made me laugh.
Abuses the forum games section
Abuses the 'What music are you listning to now'
In cool rooms, looks good.

I can go on, thats spam.

Now im finished with my rank about Jesus because overall he is a decent moderator.

@Garion & Neversoft

I couldn't agree any more.

[The Professor]

I do think not being "warned" when you receive a "warning" sort of defeats the point of the word "warning" but we shall see how it works out.

[Slowpoke]

Oh sorry, he posts:

LOL, that made me laugh.
Abuses the forum games section
Abuses the 'What music are you listning to now'
In cool rooms, looks good.

You can't abuse the forum games section or the music WAYLTK thread. There is no rule about the amount of posts you're allowed to make. As for cool rooms, I didn't know you were required to post more than that? If you are, please direct me to where that's stated

And if you get unfairly banned how can you use the thread?

By using the 'contact us' form, what do you think it's there for?

[today]

I think 5 warnings for a caution is too less... You could get like 4 warnings all on the same day and then not get any until 2 months later, but get cautioned for it. It was a lot better before where how often you broke the rules determined whether you got cautioned/banned or not. As Garion said already, you need human input, not some computer.

Warnings do NOT count towards a ban. It happens now before this new system pointless warnings were given out making a caation happen then they got reversed. So it will happen anyway, nothing new really?