new ruless

[Chippiewill]

can we have some not safe for young people tags, e.g.

[nsfy]<picture>[/nsfy]

Typing out that message takes ages.... It also means that if posting of sexual images gets over the top then you can disable all of them with ease...

[The Professor]

this is just like a modfest in this thread.

most people can judge themselves whether things are mildly sexual or clean, i don't see why, when we aren't staff, that we should have to put

HI THIS TEXT IS RED AND BOLD AND THEREFORE THIS CONTAINS A RUDE PICTURE *+*=

i think

"I warn you, this picture could be mildly explicit " would do.

The colour, font, format or whatever you want to call it really has no effect.

i kinda feel a bit insulted at how we're being told what's explicit and what isn't. we all have common sense, no matter how stupid some people are on this forum. i'm not disabled irl nor am I a "******" so I'd prefer to leave the judging of whether something is explicit or not to my own concious and common sense, however, if another person finds it explicit, or it is clearly explicit then sure, do something about it.

idk if that post made any sense at all but yh brb going to get a coffee

You were an smod, we know you have good judgement! There are lots of people on here who have proven that they don't though

[xxMATTGxx]

Can of worms, slippery slope ^

Re Catzsy's edit, obviously I didn't see what he put before it was changed but do we have to put those exact words as the warning?

can we have some not safe for young people tags, e.g.

[nsfy]<picture>[/nsfy]

Typing out that message takes ages....

I will make this easy for everyone. The "Warning" you have to post is an example as it clearly says. You can put whatever words you like as long as you make it clear that the pictures or contain under the spoiler is whatever.

[myke]

You were an smod, we know you have good judgement! There are lots of people on here who have proven that they don't though

ikr :8

i like 00chips idea of the bb tag.

you could change the word "spoiler" to "Possible inappropriate content" but under a new tag.

edit @ matt garner

http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost....7&postcount=20

Therefore making that post fine.

[xxMATTGxx]

ikr :8

i like 00chips idea of the bb tag.

you could change the word "spoiler" to "Possible inappropriate content" but under a new tag.

edit @ matt garner

http://www.habboxforum.com/showpost....7&postcount=20

Therefore making that post fine.

Correct.

[Chippiewill]

I just made a useful ammendment which people who have already posted may not notice so I will repost it so you do...

It also means that if posting of sexual images gets over the top then you can disable all of them with ease...

Unless of course VBs BBcode system is rubbish

[myke]

I think perhaps, that if 00chips' picture was mildly inappropriate that you should see some avatars that people have, including staff and get them sorted too.

[Chippiewill]

Good thing that the teddy bear in my signature has it's breasts covered

Ontopic:

I think brandon usually has some sort of sexually provocative thing in his signature/avatar....

[Catzsy]

Can of worms, slippery slope ^

Re Catzsy's edit, obviously I didn't see what he put before it was changed but do we have to put those exact words as the warning?

This is what he put before:
Warning ~ The following contains mildly sexual photography, young un's don't peek

So judge for yourself whether he was taking it seriously or not?
Also surely it is easier just to C&P from the rules? Anyway Matt has said it is fine provided it is a sensible warning.

[myke]

Catzy, it's a warning, whether he's being serious or not is another matter, he still warned.

Why should we go trapsing to the rules to get something which we can simply type. "Warning may be seen as inappropriate", I know you're trying to enforce rules or whatever but we're not vegetables and we have own our hands to type with and our own brains to thing about whats acceptable and what's not.

Just the way I see it anyway