Well, I don't think it requires much intelligence or high browness to know when dialogue is bad.
Gran Torino is a more recent example of a similar film.

Well, I don't think it requires much intelligence or high browness to know when dialogue is bad.
Gran Torino is a more recent example of a similar film.
Last edited by Misawa; 12-11-2009 at 01:04 AM.
Maybe people like that same person in a different film. Maybe thats what makes him unique? Just a thought.
I saw the film last night.. orange wednesday
and its a fantastic film the techniques used and the camera angles are fantastic.
a truelly mind tingling performance from a fantastic actor.
Credit to other actors:
the drug dealer that kenny works with, Sid the owner of the pub and others.
at what point in the film does he look or act anything, remotely like John Rambo?
so his 'Rambo' character is the same as his Miss Congeniality one?
Screenwriting Student at the University of Worcester.
23 years old!
You obviously have no idea what I'm talking about.
The moral of the story is, go see Michael Winner's Death Wish, a film with superiority in spades.
Once again i'd highly recommend this film to anyone.
The only uncomfortable actor/actress, in my opinion is Emily Mortimer who plays Frampton. Although a talented actress this role was not one that suited her best.
Yes thats right I obviously have absolutely no idea what i'm talking about... strange how you couldn't relate your post to my relation of your posts... strange.
Last edited by Sulai; 13-11-2009 at 11:52 AM.
Screenwriting Student at the University of Worcester.
23 years old!
What Adams getting at is that he speaks the same (at least I think what he's getting at) which makes it seem like he plays the sam part in every film.
However, why you think, Adam, that people care about the performances of actors, whether the fiom was shot well, what camera angles they used or other useless film stuff is important I don't know. Film is in the entertainment industry, and thus, are made to entertain. You should judge a film on how wellit entertained you, whether the right emotions were hit, whether you'd be happy to see it again in the future and so on. Yes actors may play a role in well in a film which may be why you liked the film, but there coul be bad actors, but great cgi or other aspects that are good.
This is why critics are bad, they pick out bad things and rarely pick the good things, or are biased in some way (IB and you for instance). Now please, there's like 2 people who care about your opinion on whether the film was shot good, what film
is better or who's a bad actor
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!