Murray vs Djokovic - US Open Final

[kuzkasate]

He actually explained why he said that and it's because someone teased him about something and he just replied back, not sure exactly what it was about.

I personally refer to him as both when talking about tennis and to be honest, I don't see this "when he's winning he's British, when he's losing he's Scottish" idea ever being used by commentators (also the fact both statements are true).

They aren't used by commentators, they're used in the media. Mostly in newspapers and stuff 'The third seeded Scot was knocked out of blahblah' but then 'The first Brit to win a major grand slam since blahblah' - see the difference? It's not highly noticeable so I guess most people don't pay attention to it

[dbgtz]

They aren't used by commentators, they're used in the media. Mostly in newspapers and stuff 'The third seeded Scot was knocked out of blahblah' but then 'The first Brit to win a major grand slam since blahblah' - see the difference? It's not highly noticeable so I guess most people don't pay attention to it

Oh right, I don't see what's bad. When I heard it on the news earlier they did say "the first Briton to win a grand slam in 76(?) years" but followed by "and the first Scot ever".

[kuzkasate]

Found quite a funny picture on the Telegraph

[Kardan]

They aren't used by commentators, they're used in the media. Mostly in newspapers and stuff 'The third seeded Scot was knocked out of blahblah' but then 'The first Brit to win a major grand slam since blahblah' - see the difference? It's not highly noticeable so I guess most people don't pay attention to it

That's perfectly acceptable when referring to statistics in my opinion...