
The restriction mostly spoke of is 3 times a day.
So you'd prefer post count disabled?
So if the people that post in the threads are happy with the restrictions, and the restrictions don't have an impact on those that don't post in those threads, it's just down to whether moderation can do it I guess.
But I still don't know why everyone's getting worked up about it
"Cero Miedo"
- Penta -
he's only newly active leave him alone maybe he doesn't know that it bothers u guys so much!!
th ppl who post there don't even have high post counts
pigged 25/08/2019
That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats
Because Series EP 1 is a separate topic of discussion. What's the point discussing EP 2 in EP 1? If there is a lot of discussion about whatever series this is then it's perfectly acceptable - if not? Well, it doesn't matter as you can just not read the thread as you're perfectly at liberty to do so. It's not exactly hard to skim read and you do not have to read every topic in the "recent posts" area.Well, part of the system *is* broken.
At the moment, Habbox says post count matters (this being shown by some forums having post count removed).
It seems wrong that you can post full sentences that relate to previous posts and get warned for pointless posting.
But you can easily post 'This series Ep 1', 'This series Ep 2', 'This series Ep 3' and not get warned (and get post count), but you don't get post count for typing '1', '2', '3' in forum games.
To make clear, the main problem isn't post count (I couldn't care if post count got disabled for everyone, or enabled everywhere) - it's more about making the rules consistent (especially when it says repeatedly posting one word answers is against the rules).
Also, the reason the Spam forum has no post count is because it's strictly a spam forum. The problem is that the Spam forum is now its own community where users purposely post threads which they known will get attention there. It's blatantly obvious.
The problem is as I said to scottish - Habbox wouldn't know the meaning of the word pointless if you white washed a wall, wrote the definition in huge letters and sat them down to read it while Stephen Fry loudly defines it in a deafening voice.Just an example of the current 'pointless posting' rule, which essentially revolves around 'Don't pointless post for post count/tokens':
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=799526 - Thread gets moved to spam because it's 'better suited'. Why? Is it because it's a 'Post your' thread?
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...73#post8137273 - This post gets rightfully warned with a pointless post... but
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...06#post8135606 - This post gets reported and gets refused - despite the posts being virtually identical.
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthread.php?t=798747 - Only *some* threads get moved to spam for pointless posting
Apparently, you can post two sets of 'Congratulations' in the same congratulations thread and not get warned for pointless posting (Was reported and not warned):
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...02#post8145702
http://www.habboxforum.com/showthrea...41#post8146841
And then of course, with these 'post your' threads, you can post 'PJs' or 'News' repeatedly, despite there being a forum rule against that.
Also, isn't this being a bit anal over nothing? Your problem seems to be with the rule which I've always said has been poorly written - the "post your" threads as by the definition of the Pointless Posting rule are not pointless as they clearly have a point. Say out loud "The point behind the post your setup thread is to post my setup". That's the point, to post your setup. Same for "post what you're wearing" - if people say PJs then they've grasped the simple concept of what the point behind the thread is - to post what they're wearing.
I would go through all the maths and statistics I did the last time this discussion came up where it was discovered that the number of posts in those threads would hardly make someone a Habbox God anytime soon. It was something like, assuming 30 people have ever posted in one of those threads, they would have made about 975 posts within the 3 years of their presumed membership, which isn't a lot and quite a waste of time if that's what they're aiming for - but there's no use focusing on assumptions which is what is wrong with this thread, as it assumes people are posting in these threads to raise their post count when they may just be bored and doing for a mild kick of entertainment - which seems to be unwanted on this forum these days - "fun" is a horrible thing.
Last edited by GommeInc; 06-04-2014 at 04:34 PM.
LEFT
FOM & FOW
If you need me, feel free to PM me here for contact details.
Post count really isn't the issue. I understand that everyone moans about how the people posting there don't deserve post counts for all those pointless posts.
BUT. Post count aside, it's those threads that are actually the annoyance.
I don't really care for post count, I wouldn't care either way if it was removed. But what does annoy me is that every time I click the 'What's New' tab, there is the 'What are you watching/wearing/listening to' threads every time. They are so beyond pointless.
When we ran the Mole there were some complaints about our threads clogging up the games forum so they got moved together. Now I know sticking them somewhere won't stop them showing on What's New, but in the same respect they are clogging up the forum with pointless crap.
That's the only thing that bothers me about them.
So, they can't be trashed because they are 'important to history, or the last 9 years worth of posts' blah blah...' Fine. But as a community do we really think that important posts of the forum's history is what John was wearing on a Friday night 9 years ago? Because I don't think that's important. And if they are needed for history, then fine. Close them, keep them for history, but don't let it go any further... Just stop them from now on.
T'is tres annoying!
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!