
I think it will pay x much a year to have unlimited music? Rather like Spotify.
ANYWAY, does this mean we will get beats headphones instead of the white ones? haha *i wish*
Last +REP from: Kardan
Really? That confuses everything. The electronics side seems to be the part of the business people dislike - expensive headphones that do not really do anything spectacular compared to other headphones (going by the opinions on here too).
LEFT
FOM & FOW
If you need me, feel free to PM me here for contact details.
According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, I'm getting this from Neowin as the WSJ article is behind a pay wall:
But a lot of the other articles about the whole deal is them believing Apple bought them for the streaming service "Beats Music" so then they try and get into that game.A report from the Wall Street Journal (via MacRumors) breaks down the financials of the deal further than the $3 billion on Apple's press release, of which $2.6 billion is cash and $400 million is stock. According to the report, Apple paid $2.5 billion for Beats Electronics and a little under $500 million for Beats Music, which has 250,000 paying subscribers in the US.
I guess we will only really find out in the next couple of years what Apple will actually do with it.
Does beats music have much of an audience though? I didn't think it would be worth it for Apple considering it could probably do its own service better. Does beats audio have something apple doesn't?According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, I'm getting this from Neowin as the WSJ article is behind a pay wall:
But a lot of the other articles about the whole deal is them believing Apple bought them for the streaming service "Beats Music" so then they try and get into that game.
I guess we will only really find out in the next couple of years what Apple will actually do with it.
Want to hide these adverts? Register an account for free!