Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 34 of 34
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cornwall (UK)
    Posts
    2,329
    Tokens
    6,755
    Habbo
    -Nick

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xxMATTGxx View Post
    A report came out today with some actual figures and if it's true they paid more for Beats Electronics than for the Beats Music. So I do wonder what their actual plan is for them.
    I think it will pay x much a year to have unlimited music? Rather like Spotify.


    ANYWAY, does this mean we will get beats headphones instead of the white ones? haha *i wish*


    Quote Originally Posted by xxMATTGxx View Post
    Nick is harmless and he's not a bad person after you have spoken to him a few times.
    Last +REP from: Kardan


  2. #32
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xxMATTGxx View Post
    A report came out today with some actual figures and if it's true they paid more for Beats Electronics than for the Beats Music. So I do wonder what their actual plan is for them.
    Really? That confuses everything. The electronics side seems to be the part of the business people dislike - expensive headphones that do not really do anything spectacular compared to other headphones (going by the opinions on here too).

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    23,590
    Tokens
    33,607
    Habbo
    xxMATTGxx

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    Really? That confuses everything. The electronics side seems to be the part of the business people dislike - expensive headphones that do not really do anything spectacular compared to other headphones (going by the opinions on here too).
    According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, I'm getting this from Neowin as the WSJ article is behind a pay wall:

    A report from the Wall Street Journal (via MacRumors) breaks down the financials of the deal further than the $3 billion on Apple's press release, of which $2.6 billion is cash and $400 million is stock. According to the report, Apple paid $2.5 billion for Beats Electronics and a little under $500 million for Beats Music, which has 250,000 paying subscribers in the US.
    But a lot of the other articles about the whole deal is them believing Apple bought them for the streaming service "Beats Music" so then they try and get into that game.

    I guess we will only really find out in the next couple of years what Apple will actually do with it.

    Previous Habbox Roles
    Co-Owner of Habbox | General Manager | Assistant General Manager (Staff) | Forum Manager | Super Moderator | Forum Moderator

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    2,956
    Tokens
    7,870

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xxMATTGxx View Post
    According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, I'm getting this from Neowin as the WSJ article is behind a pay wall:



    But a lot of the other articles about the whole deal is them believing Apple bought them for the streaming service "Beats Music" so then they try and get into that game.

    I guess we will only really find out in the next couple of years what Apple will actually do with it.
    Does beats music have much of an audience though? I didn't think it would be worth it for Apple considering it could probably do its own service better. Does beats audio have something apple doesn't?

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •