Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 53
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    5,642
    Tokens
    12,297
    Habbo
    djclune

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by conservative View Post
    The only thing I would say about the £13,000 watch is that I question whether someone with the cash would go for an Apple "Watch Edition", as opposed to an exceptionally good timepiece from Tag, Rolex, Dior etcetera. It is a bit like cars and the talk of tech companies getting in on cars - it just doesn't make sense to me.
    I'm sure that somebody considering spending £13,000 on a watch which will be outdated in a couple of years can afford both.
    That's when Ron vanished, came back speaking Spanish
    Lavish habits, two rings, twenty carats

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Don View Post
    I'm sure that somebody considering spending £13,000 on a watch which will be outdated in a couple of years can afford both.
    The question is whether they would WANT both.

    Apple is a good brand, but it isn't a 'luxury' brand on the scale of the aforementioned brands.


  3. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    11,986
    Tokens
    1,829

    Latest Awards:

    Default Apple Spring Event.

    This new wave of smart watches is so baffling to me - the fact that non watch wearers are considering buying them even more so. Will be interesting to see how apple'a standard model of planned obsolescence translates in the world of watches and wearable accessories. People will pay that much for a slightly tweaked phone every year but will they do the same for a new watch design? I'm not so sure. Can't see apple taking control of the well established luxury market either but good luck to them.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland.
    Posts
    13,083
    Tokens
    2,964
    Habbo
    Yet

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Am I the only one who thinks the display is going to be ridiculously small + if they make it bigger it'll look stupid and would be far too 'bulky'
    ofwgktadgaf

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    2,405
    Tokens
    9,762
    Habbo
    Wennn.

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    The ones with a £13,000 price tag are made of gold and will be available in limited units, so I don't find that shocking at all. They actually look pretty good though, and there will definitely be people who are willing to pay that amount for the exclusivity of it all. As for the MacBooks, I'd say they're targeted at people who are into luxuries and see their devices as more of a fashion accessory. It's not a bad move, the gold one is super gorgeous and I'm sure they'll sell loads of those. They've done some incredible engineering with it too. Personally I find the announcement of ResearchKit most exciting though, and cannot wait to see its impact on medical research.



    @habboxgraphics on Twitter

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Leeds
    Posts
    17,006
    Tokens
    26,366
    Habbo
    e5

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    It's perfect for apple fans because it links to their phone etc. I'd only go for apple watch as I'd only go for apple phones and i'd want them to link. I want to get one to see what it's like but I don't think i'd wear it too often.. I can imagine it getting broken easily some how

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Lol the only Apple Watch that I thought looked pretty nice is £850. Really.

    That makes it £60 more than the 128gb iPhone 6 Plus....
    Last edited by AgnesIO; 11-03-2015 at 10:20 PM.


  8. #38
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Essex
    Posts
    23,585
    Tokens
    9,258

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by conservative View Post
    Lol the only Apple Watch that I thought looked pretty nice is £850. Really.

    That makes it £60 more than the 128gb iPhone 6 Plus....
    Which is crazy seeing as it relies on the iPhone to have most of its functionality - and the fact the iPhone does more.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16,195
    Tokens
    3,454

    Latest Awards:

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GommeInc View Post
    Which is crazy seeing as it relies on the iPhone to have most of its functionality - and the fact the iPhone does more.
    Exactly It looks nice, but I really cannot get my head around the pricing.


  10. #40
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    urmum
    Posts
    1,815
    Tokens
    1,935
    Habbo
    urmum

    Latest Awards:

    Default


Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •